

You already know where your development time disappears to.
BWC's paper-based forms turn a limited-scope job analysis into a document-chasing project. There's a faster way to generate high-value ergonomic reports within the award.
The paper-based way
Manual forms that are difficult to maintain
BWC forms are limited to work injury claims.
No options to validate and search job data
Stalled approvals while paperwork is getting chased down
Grant hours spent on training that delays projects.
The ErgoFIT way
BWC-approved digital alternative to paper forms
Mobile surveys to validate and maintain job data
Reports designed for personal or work injuries.
Mobile surveys to validate/maintain job data
Faster employer buy-in/sign-off
Grant hours spent on what employers actually need
01
Every BWC dollar goes to the analysis, not the overhaul.
Dedicate the full grant award — $3,700 to $8,200 — specifically to functional job analysis. It's a limited-scope strategy employers love, because it delivers immediate, measurable value without asking them to rebuild their internal policies.
02
The paperwork nightmare that stalls these projects — gone.
Faster buy-in from employers. Smoother project delivery for you. A consulting workflow that fits into their daily operations instead of interrupting them.
03
ErgoFIT: one database for job demands and provider resources.
A digital platform built to manage exactly this — job demands and preferred provider resources, organized in a single structure. It's currently the only program approved as an alternative to BWC's paper-based forms.
"This has been a game-changer for my own consulting practice — we've moved from paper to digital, and I want to show other providers how it fits into their workflow."
Dr. Rick Wickstrom — President, WorkAbility Systems & WorkerFIT
SCALED PRICING TIERS
The award scales with the workforce. So does the payoff.
BWC sets the grant amount by headcount — which means the more employees a client has, the more of the analysis you can fund with their award instead of billing it out-of-pocket. Here's how the tiers break down.
$3,700
● 11-49 employees
● Up to 10 jobs
$6,800
● 50-199 employees
● Up to 19 jobs
$8,200
● 200+ employees
● Up to 23 jobs
15-MINUTE STRATEGY CALL
Find out where your job-analysis process is costing you time.
In one focused conversation, Dr. Rick Wickstrom will help you identify the biggest source of administrative friction in your current workflow and explore practical ways to complete job analyses more efficiently, consistently, and at greater scale.
✔︎ Focused on your process ✔︎ No obligation ✔︎ Clear next steps
What we'll explore
The conversation is tailored to how you work today. You’ll walk through the areas that most directly affect your time, documentation quality, capacity, and ability to grow.
Your current workflow
Walk through how you currently manage a job analysis from intake through submission to BWC.
Documentation delays
Explore whether missing, inconsistent, or incomplete information is causing cases to be delayed or returned.
Your current volume
Look at how many job analyses you complete today and whether your current process can support more.
How you track the work
Review how you organize completed analyses, preferred-provider information, and active cases today.
Your biggest time drain
Identify the steps that create the most manual work or back-and-forth with BWC or employers.
Your team capacity
Discuss whether you manage the work yourself or rely on clinicians, administrators, or other team members.
What you'll leave with
You'll leave with a clearer understanding of what is slowing you down—and what to do next.
A clearer view of your current process
See how the work moves from intake through submission and where avoidable delays are introduced.
Your highest-impact bottleneck
Identify the step creating the most administrative work, waiting, rework, or communication friction.
Practical ways to reduce admin time
Explore opportunities to simplify documentation, tracking, coordination, and case management.
A personalized recommendation
Gain clarity on whether improving your internal workflow or using a partner-supported model makes more sense.
A low-risk way to evaluate a better process
Know whether to make an immediate process improvement, schedule a deeper demo, or explore another delivery model.

